There are two major types of high-risk situations, those with intrapersonal determinants, in which the person’s response is physical or psychological in nature, and interpersonal determinants, those that are influenced by other individuals or social networks. Relapse Prevention (RP) is another well-studied model used in both AUD and DUD treatment (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985). In its original form, RP aims to reduce risk of relapse by teaching participants cognitive and behavioral skills for coping in high-risk situations (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985). More recent versions of RP have included mindfulness-based techniques (Bowen, Chawla, & Marlatt, 2010; Witkiewitz et al., 2014). The RP model has been studied among individuals with both AUD and DUD (especially Cocaine Use Disorder, e.g., Carroll, Rounsaville, & Gawin, 1991); with the largest effect sizes identified in the treatment of AUD (Irvin, Bowers, Dunn, & Wang, 1999).
The RP model views relapse not as a failure, but as part of the recovery process and an opportunity for learning. Marlatt (1985) describes an abstinence violation effect (AVE) that leads people to respond to any return to drug or alcohol use after a period of abstinence with despair and a sense of failure. By undermining confidence, these negative thoughts and feelings increase the likelihood that an isolated “lapse” will lead to a full-blown relapse. If, however, individuals view lapses as temporary setbacks or errors in the process of learning a new skill, they can renew their efforts to remain abstinent.
4. Consequences of abstinence-only treatment
In a similar fashion, the nature of these attributions determines whether the violation will lead to full-blown relapse. When abstinence is violated, individuals typically also have an emotional response consisting of guilt, shame, hopelessness, loss of control, and/or a sense of failure; they may use drugs or alcohol in an attempt to cope with the negative feelings that abstinence violation effect definition resulted from their abstinence violation. A person may experience a particularly stressful emotional event in their lives and may turn to alcohol and/or drugs to cope with these negative emotions. An abstinence violation can also occur in individuals with low self-efficacy, since they do not feel very confident in their ability to carry out their goal of abstinence.
- Further, there are reasons to presume a problem will re-emerge on returning to the old environment that elicited and maintained the problem behaviour; for instance, forgetting the skills, techniques, and information taught during therapy; and decreased motivation5.
- (b) Restrained eaters whose diets were broken by a milkshake preload showed increased activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) compared to restrained eaters who did not consume the preload and satiated non-dieters [64].
- Similar to the reward thought, you may have another common thought after a period of sobriety.
- Multiple versions of harm reduction psychotherapy for alcohol and drug use have been described in detail but not yet studied empirically.
I’ve heard of AA meetings where a member with over 10 years of sobriety ends up drinking (let’s say as an attempt to cope with the loss of a loved one or other tragic event). Many would rather keep on drinking rather than come back to a primary source of support in shame. It seems akin to failing one exam during senior year in high school and being sent back to first grade as a result!
Historical context of nonabstinence approaches
It is for this reason that someone’s tolerance declines following a period of abstinence and that they may overdose if they start using again at the same level as before. Many people can relate to this feeling of guilt when they use a substance, like alcohol or marijuana, after promising themselves they wouldn’t. While relapse doesn’t mean you can’t achieve lasting sobriety, it can be a disheartening setback in your recovery. Our addiction treatment network offers comprehensive care for alcohol addiction, opioid addiction, and all other forms of drug addiction. Our treatment options include detox, inpatient treatment, outpatient treatment, medication-assisted treatment options, and more. Triggers include cravings, problematic thought patterns, and external cues or situations, all of which can contribute to increased self-efficacy (a sense of personal confidence, identity, and control) when properly managed.
Consistent with the philosophy of harm reduction as described by Marlatt et al. (2001), harm reduction psychotherapy is accepting of a wide range of client goals, including risk reduction, moderation, and abstinence (of note, abstinence is conceptualized as consistent with harm reduction when it is a goal chosen by the client). However, to date there have been no published empirical trials testing the effectiveness of the approach. The past 20 years has seen growing acceptance of harm reduction, evidenced in U.S. public health policy as well as SUD treatment research. Thirty-two states now have legally authorized SSPs, a number which has doubled since 2014 (Fernández-Viña et al., 2020).
Understand The Relapse Process
At the start of treatment, Rajiv was not keen engage to in the process of recovery, having failed at multiple attempts over the years (motivation to change, influence of past learning experiences with abstinence). In a subsequent meta-analysis by Irwin, twenty-six published and unpublished studies representing a sample of 9,504 participants were included. Specifically, RP was most effective when applied to alcohol or polysubstance use disorders, combined with the adjunctive use of medication, and when evaluated immediately following treatment. Moderation analyses suggested that RP was consistently efficacious across treatment modalities (individual vs. group) and settings (inpatient vs. outpatient)22.
- This finding supplements the numerous studies that identify lack of readiness for abstinence as the top reason for non-engagement in SUD treatment, even among those who recognize a need for treatment (e.g., Chen, Strain, Crum, & Mojtabai, 2013; SAMHSA, 2019a).
- Inaction has typically been interpreted as the acceptance of substance cues which can be described as “letting go” and not acting on an urge.
- These hypotheses were supported by the present study, such that participants with a self-reported goal of complete abstinence had better overall clinical outcomes following 16 weeks of alcohol dependence treatment.
- Cue exposure is another behavioural technique based on the classical conditioning theory and theories of cue reactivity and extinction12,13.
- Abstinence continues to be the dominant approach to alcohol treatment in the United States, while non-abstinent approaches tend to be more acceptable abroad (Klingemann & Rosenberg, 2009; Luquiens, Reynaud, & Aubin, 2011).
On the other hand, if the reason for the violation is attributed to external, unstable, and/or local factors, such as an extremely tempting situation, then the individual is more likely to recover from the violation and get back onto the path of abstinence. Thus, while it is vital to empirically test nonabstinence treatments, implementation research examining strategies to obtain buy-in from agency leadership may be just as impactful. In addition to issues with administrative discharge, abstinence-only treatment may contribute to high rates of individuals not completing SUD treatment. About 26% of all U.S. treatment episodes end by individuals leaving the treatment program prior to treatment completion (SAMHSA, 2019b).
Cognitive behavioural models of substance use
It is essential to understand what individuals with SUD are rejecting when they say they do not need treatment. In this model, treatment success is defined as achieving and sustaining total abstinence from alcohol and drugs, and readiness for treatment is conflated with commitment to abstinence (e.g., Harrell, Trenz, Scherer, Martins, & Latimer, 2013). Additionally, the system is punitive to those who do not achieve abstinence, as exemplified by the widespread practice of involuntary treatment discharge for those who return to use (White, Scott, Dennis, & Boyle, 2005). People in addiction recovery often experience drug cravings when they go through stress. When you are feeling overwhelmed, your brain may unconsciously crave drugs as a way to help you feel better.
